Federal ERISA compliance requires specific bonding.

Retirement Plan ERISA Fidelity Bonds: A Plan-Type Decision Guide

Use plan design, employee coverage, property, handling, and exemption facts to route a retirement arrangement through the ERISA §412 analysis.

Published:
Last reviewed:
Sources verified:

This page is a router, not a conclusion that every retirement plan or tax-qualified arrangement needs a bond. Identify the actual design, then apply Title I, Part 4, property, natural-person handling, exemptions, amount, and form. ERISA's pension and individual-account definitions—not a marketing or tax label—supply the federal-law starting point. 29 U.S.C. §1002(2), (34) 29 U.S.C. §1112

Use the §412 decision sequence

  1. 1Identify the actual retirement arrangement and confirm an employee pension benefit plan exists.
  2. 2Test Title I coverage, then Part 4 applicability.
  3. 3Identify the plan’s funds or other property.
  4. 4Identify each natural person whose functions constitute handling.
  5. 5Test exemptions separately for each person or institution.
  6. 6Calculate each nonexempt handler’s amount and review compliant form, live surety, and current reporting materials.

Choose the guide from the actual design

A “qualified plan” under §401(a) can use several of these designs and has no separate §412 rule. Likewise, Keogh or HR-10 is not a bonding category; determine the design and route owner-only census questions to the owner-only guide. IRS Publication 560 29 C.F.R. §2510.3-3(b)–(c)

Facts that change the answer

Example: route the facts before deciding

A corporation calls its arrangement a “qualified retirement plan.” Its document shows a cash-balance benefit, while a separate plan has participant-directed individual accounts. The first routes to the defined-benefit guide and the second to the defined-contribution guide. Qualification alone answers neither plan's §412 result; each still needs its own Title I, property, handler, and exemption review. Internal Revenue Service 29 U.S.C. §1112

Handling is functional and person-specific. Custody, transfer power, disbursement or signature authority, final authority over investments or payments, and supervision of those functions can create a risk of loss. A fiduciary, officer, trustee, or provider title is not dispositive, and controls are relevant to whether handling exists rather than an independent exemption. 29 C.F.R. §2580.412-6 FAB 2008-04, Q5–Q8 and Q18–Q21

Continue with the applicable compliance owner

After selecting the plan-specific route and identifying nonexempt handlers, use the coverage calculation guide for the person-specific amount and the requirements guide for bond form, surety, and filing-year review. 29 U.S.C. §1112 29 C.F.R. §2580.412-11

Methodology and legal boundary

This guide applies the federal ERISA §412 sequence to a plan category; it does not interpret a particular plan document, determine worker status, decide governmental or church affiliation, classify an ambiguous target-benefit design, or approve a bond form or surety. Use current documents, census and authority records, and obtain benefits counsel for unresolved classification facts. 29 U.S.C. §1002 29 U.S.C. §1003 29 U.S.C. §1101 29 U.S.C. §1112

Editorial Methodology & Legal Notice

Educational federal-law screening only, not legal advice or a plan-specific determination. The analysis follows plan existence, Title I, Part 4, property, natural-person handling, person or institution exemptions, amount and form, and current surety and reporting review. IRS material is used only to identify tax-plan designs.

Official Sources & Citations